• Home   /  
  • Archive by category "1"

Budzynski Biofeedback Evaluation Essay

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84 191–215.Google Scholar

  • Beaton, R., Egan, K., Betrus, P., & Nakagawa, H. (1982). Cost-benefit analysis of out-patient stress response management training.Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Biofeedback Society of America, 27–30.Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, E., Andrasik, F., Appelbaum, K., Evans, D., Jurish, S., Teders, S., Rodichok, L., & Barron, K. (1985). The efficacy and cost effectiveness of minimal-therapist-contact, non-drug treatments of chronic migraine and tension headache.Headache, 25 214–220.Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, E., Jaccard, J., Andrasik, F., Guarnieri, P., & Jurish, S. (1985). Reduction in headache patients' medical expenses associated with biofeedback and relaxation treatments.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 10 63.Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, E., McCoy, G., Musso, A., Gerardi, M., Pallmeyer, T., Gerardi, R., Cotch, P., Siracusa, K., & Andrasik, F. (1986). A controlled comparison of thermal biofeedback and relaxation training in the treatment of essential hypertension: Short-term and long-term outcome.Behavior Therapy, 17 563–579.Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, E., & Schwartz, S. (1987). Adaptation of a multi-component treatment for irritable bowel syndrome to a small-group format.Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Biofeedback Society of America, 1–3.Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, E., & Young, L. (1974). Clinical applications of biofeedback training: A review of the evidence. In L. DiCara, T. X. Barber, J. Kamiya, N. Miller, D. Shapiro, & J. Stoyva (Eds.),Biofeedback and Self-Control (pp. 3–39). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

  • Bootman, J., Rowland, C., & Wertheimer, A. (1979). Cost-benefit analysis: A research tool for evaluating innovative health programs.Evaluation and Health Professions, 2 129–154.Google Scholar

  • Bradley, L., Young, L., Anderson, K., McDaniel, L., Turner, R., & Agudelo, C. (1984). Psychological approaches to the management of arthritis pain.Social Science and Medicine, 19 1353–1360.Google Scholar

  • Bradley, L., Young, L., Anderson, K., Turner, R., Agudelo, C., McDaniel, L., Pisko, E., Semble, E., & Morgan, T. (in press). Effects of psychological therapy on pain behavior of rheumatoid arthritis patients: Treatment outcome and six-month follow-up.Arthritis and Rheumatism.Google Scholar

  • Budzynski, T., Stoyva, J., & Peffer, K. (1977). Biofeedback techniques in psychosomatic disorders. In E. Foa & A. Goldstein (Eds.),Handbook of behavioral interventions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Charlesworth, E., Williams, B., & Baer, P. (1984). Stress management at the worksite for hypertension: Compliance, cost-benefit, health care and hypertension-related variables.Psychosomatic Medicine, 46 387–397.Google Scholar

  • Croog, S., Levine, S., Testa, M., Brown, B., Bulpitt, C., Jenkins, C., Klerman, G., & Williams, G. (1986). The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.New England Journal of Medicine, 314 1657–1664.Google Scholar

  • Devine, E., & Cook, T. (1983). A meta-analytic analysis of effects of psychoeducational interventions on length of postsurgical hospital stay.Nursing Research, 32 267–274.Google Scholar

  • Fahrion, S., Norris, P., Green, E., Green, A., & Schnar, R. (1987). Biobehavioral treatment of essential hypertension: A group outcome study.Biofeedback and Self Regulation, 11 257–278.Google Scholar

  • Fahrion, S. (in press). Cost effectiveness in biobehavioral treatment of hypertension.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation.Google Scholar

  • Flor, H., Haag, G., Turk, D., & Koehler, H. (1983). Efficacy of EMG biofeedback, pseudotherapy, and conventional medical treatment for chronic rheumatic back pain.Pain, 17 21–31.Google Scholar

  • Friedman, M., & Ulmer, D. (1984).Treating Type A behavior and your heart. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar

  • Friedman, M., Ulmer, D., Brown, B., Breall, W., & Dixon, T. (1986). Alteration of Type A behavior and its effect on cardiac recurrences in post myocardial infarction patients: Summary results of the recurrent coronary prevention project.American Heart Journal, 112 653–665.Google Scholar

  • Gill, J., Pride, D., Friedman, M., Thoreson, C., Powell, L., Ulmer, D., Brown, B., & Drews, F. (1985). Reduction in Type A behavior in healthy middle-aged American military officers.American Heart Journal, 110 503–514.Google Scholar

  • Glass, G. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research.Educational Research, 10 3–8.Google Scholar

  • Gonick, U., Farrow, I., Meier, M., Ostman, G., & Frolick, L. (1981). Cost effectiveness of behavioral medicine procedures in the treatment of stress-related disorders.American Journal of Clinical Biofeedback, 4 16–24.Google Scholar

  • Jacobs, D. (1983, December). Toward a formula for professional survival in troubled times.APA Newsletter, p. 3.Google Scholar

  • Jacobs, D. (in press). Cost effectiveness of specialized psychological programs for reducing hospital stays and outpatient visits.Journal of Clinical Psychology.Google Scholar

  • Jurish, S., Blanchard, E., Andrasik, F., Teders, S., Neff, D., & Arena, J. (1983). Home- versus clinic-based treatment of vascular headache.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51 743–751.Google Scholar

  • Keefe, F., & Hoelscher, T. (1987). Biofeedback in the management of chronic pain syndromes. In J. Hatch, J. Fisher, & J. Rugh (Eds.),Biofeedback, Studies in clinical efficacy (pp. 211–253). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

  • Keefe, F., Surwit, R., & Pilon, R. (1979). A one-year follow-up of Raynaud's patients treated with behavioral therapy techniques.Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2 385–391.Google Scholar

  • Levin, H. (1983).Cost effectiveness: A primer. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Linton, S. (1986). Behavioral remediation of chronic pain: A status report.Pain, 24 125–141.Google Scholar

  • Mager, E. (1982). Biofeedback therapy impact on patient utilization of health care sevices.Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 1969B. (University Microfilms No. 8323562).Google Scholar

  • Manuso, J. (1983). The Equitable Life Assurance Society program.Preventive Medicine, 12 658–662.Google Scholar

  • Marzuk, P. (1985). Biofeedback for hypertension: A position paper of the Health and Public Policy Committee, American College of Physicians.Annals of Internal Medicine, 102 709–715.Google Scholar

  • McGrady, A., Fine, T., Woerner, M., & Yonker, R. (1983). Maintenance of treatment effects: Biofeedback-assisted relaxation in patients with essential hypertension.American Journal of Clinical Biofeedback, 6 34–38.Google Scholar

  • Norris, P. (1986). On the status of biofeedback and clinical practice.American Psychologist, 41 1009–1010.Google Scholar

  • Olbrisch, M. (1981). Evaluation of a stress management program for high utilizers of a prepaid university health service.Medical Care, 19 153–159.Google Scholar

  • Patel, C. (1975). Yoga and biofeedback in the management of “stress” in hypertensive patients.Clinical Science and Molecular Medicine, 48 171–174.Google Scholar

  • Patel, C., Marmot, M., & Terry, D. (1981). Controlled trial of biofeedback-aided behavioral methods in reducing mild hypertension.British Medical Journal [Clinical Research], 28 2005–2008.Google Scholar

  • Patel, C., Marmot, M., Terry, D., Carruthers, M., Hunt, B., & Patel, M. (1985). Trial of relaxation in reducing coronary risk: Four-year follow-up.British Medical Journal, 290 1103–1105.Google Scholar

  • Roberts, A. (1985). Biofeedback: Research, training, and clinical roles.American Psychologist, 40 938–941.Google Scholar

  • Roberts, A. (1986). Biofeedback, science, and training.American Psychologist, 41 1010.Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, G. (1987, March).Biofeedback: An integrated health science. Paper presented at the meeting of the Biofeedback Society of America, Boston.Google Scholar

  • Shellenberger, R., & Green, J. (1986).From the ghost in the box to successful biofeedback training. Greeley, Colorado: Health Psychology Publications.Google Scholar

  • Shellenberger, R., Turner, J., Green, J., & Cooney, J. (1986). Health changes in a biofeedback and stress management program.Clinical Biofeedback and Health, 9 23–24.Google Scholar

  • Silver, B., & Blanchard, E. (1978). Biofeedback or relaxation training in the treatment of psychophysiologic disorders: Or, are the machines really necessary?Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1 217–239.Google Scholar

  • Steig, R., & Williams, P. (1983). Cost effectiveness study of multidisciplinary pain treatment of industrial-injured workers.Seminars in Neurology, 3 375.Google Scholar

  • Taub, E., Culp., C., & Mager, E. (in press). Cost effectiveness of biofeedback treatment in a hospital outpatient clinic.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation.Google Scholar

  • Tenders, S., Blanchard, E., Andrasik, F., Jurish, S., Neff, D., & Auna, J. (1984). Relaxation training for tension headache: Comparative efficaacy and cost-effectiveness of a minimal therapist contact versus a therapist-delivered procedure.Behavior Therapy, 15 59–70.Google Scholar

  • Thompson, M. (1980).Benefit-cost analysis for program evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Toevs, C., Kaplan, R., & Atkins, C. (1984). The costs and effects of behavioral programs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Medical Care, 22 1088–1099.Google Scholar

  • Toomin, M., & Toomin, H. (1975). GSR biofeedback in psychotherapy: Some clinical observations.Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12 41–45.Google Scholar

  • Walker, S. (1985).Effects of a stress management/performance enhancement program on average monthly production. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

  • Weiss, S. (1987, March).Health promotion at the worksite: Cost effective? Paper presented at the meeting of the Biofeedback Society of America, Boston.Google Scholar

  • Williams, R. (1984). Type A behavior and coronary heart disease: Something old, something new.Behavioral Medicine Update, 6 29–33.Google Scholar

  • Wolf, S., & Fischer-Williams, M. (1987). The use of biofeedback in disorders of motor function. In J. Hatch, J. Fisher, & J. Rugh (Eds.),Biofeedback studies in clinical efficacy (pp. 153–177). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

  • Wolpe, J., & Lazarus, A. (1966).Behavior therapy techniques, New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

  • Wright, C. (1979). Seeking a new medical horizon: Towards a rational approach for reducing the contribution of psychosocial stress to illness behaviors.Dissertation Abstracts International, 40 3979B-3980B. (University Microfilms No. 8003029).Google Scholar

  • Yates, B. (1980).Improving effectiveness and reducing costs in mental health. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas.Google Scholar

  • Yates, B. (1985). Cost-effectiveness analysis and cost benefit analyses: An introduction.Behavioral Assessment, 7 207–234.Google Scholar

  • Zeckhauser, R. (Speaker). (1987, March). Symposium on cost-effectiveness [cassette recording]. Presented at the meeting of the Biofeedback Society of America, Boston.Google Scholar

  • Budzynski, Thomas, Johann Stoyva, and Charles Adler. “Feedback-induced muscle relaxation: Application to tension headache.” Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1.3 (1970): 205-211.


    This is the second study we will be looking at from the ‘managing stress’ section of ‘Stress’, as part of your OCR A2 Health and Clinical Psychology course. It is further categorised into ‘Behavioural


    The last study we looked at considered a cognitive method of reducing stress and anxiety: stress inoculation therapy. In the Budzynski et al (1970) different way to reduce stress is by using biofeedback which has a behavioural perspective as its basis.

    By giving visual or audible feedback on the state of the body, and rewarding us for reducing that stress reaction, biofeedback would assume that we would be more likely to repeat the method of reducing stress. This is based upon behaviourist principles of learning and behaviour.

    This is the technique used by Budzynski on his research with patients with tension headaches Tension headaches are felt across the top of the head and sometimes in the forehead; it gradually becomes worse and can last for weeks.  These headaches are thought to be caused by sustained contraction of the scalp and neck muscles which is associated with stress.  Therefore, it follows that by relaxing these muscles, the headaches should be reduced.


    Budzynski et al (1970) – studied the use of biofeedback in reducing tension headaches.


    To see whether biofeedback is an effective method of reducing tension headaches. 

    Method and Design

    Experiment, with patients being trained in a laboratory.

    Volunteer Sampling was used.

    Independent design. The participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups:


    18 participants who replied to an advertisement in a local paper in Colorado.


    For two weeks patients kept a record of their headaches.

    Groups A and B were given 16 sessions of training, with 2 sessions each week for 8 weeks.

    Group A were taught relaxation and told the ‘clicks’ of the biofeedback machine would reflect their muscle tension, with slower clicks indicating less muscle tension.

    Group B were told to concentrate on the varying clicks. They were given pseudo-feedback.

    Group C were given no training but were told they would begin training in two months.


    The muscle tension of Group A was significantly different from Group B by the end of the training, and after three months, Group A’s tension was significantly lower than Group B’s.

    Group A’s reported headaches dropped significantly from their baseline, whereas the other didn’t, and was also significantly less than Group B’s and Group C’s reported headaches.

    Drug usage in Group A decreased, more than in Group B.

    Group A reported less headache activity than Group B.

    There was a follow up for Group A after 18 months, when four out of the six participants were contacted. Three reported very low headache activity and the fourth reported some reduction.


    Biofeedback is an effective way at training patients to relax and reduce their tension headaches, so can be seen as an effective method of stress management.

    Relaxation training is also more effective than just being monitored, but is better when used together with biofeedback.

    Budzynski et al (1970) Evaluation

    + Usefulness – the study is highly useful as it suggests that using both relaxation training and biofeedback together is an effective way of managing stress.

    + Validity – the use of the pseudobiofeedback condition increases the validity of the study because we can see that effect observed in the real condition was not due to the placebo effect and was due to the manipulation.

    – Small sample – the sample is both small and ethnocentric meaning generalising the results is difficult. Furthermore, the researchers only studied tension headaches and did not consider other medical ailments.

    – Validity – the study was only a snapshot and therefore we cannot see if the results of the study stick or if the participants would require consistent treatment.


    Budzynski, Thomas, Johann Stoyva, and Charles Adler. “Feedback-induced muscle relaxation: Application to tension headache.” Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1.3 (1970): 205-211.

    Further Reading

    OCR A2 Psychology Student Unit Guide New Edition: Unit G543 Health and Clinical Psychology (Student Unit Guides)

    Psych Yogi’s Top Ten Psychology Revision Tips for the A* Student


    Article Name

    Budzynski et al (1970) - Behavioural


    Revise 'managing stress' section of 'Stress' part of your OCR A2 Health & Clinical Psychology course. Evaluation further categorised into 'Behavioural' Revision


    Psych Yogi

    One thought on “Budzynski Biofeedback Evaluation Essay

    Leave a comment

    L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *