Joanna LU 44655185 10/04/15 ASSIGNMENT 2: INTEGRATIVE SUMMARY Treatments towards asylum seeker and refugees in Australia have slowly come to light as frequent incidents of mistreatment have been recorded and publicised. These include poor living conditions and neglected medical attention and that when compared to animals, it is said that animals have it better (Burnside, 2014). This reveals a prominent gap between Australia’s Human rights obligation under international law and the current treatment towards asylum seekers and refugees (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2013). However, Australia has taken significant steps towards the issue by developing systems which support the Commission’s recommendations and international immigration detention network (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2013). The detentions in Australia constantly breach the United Nations Human Rights Committee’s (UNHRC) human rights obligation causing negative effects to develop within the asylum seekers and refugees placed there. The Snapshot report by the Australian Human Rights Commission (2013) stated that under UNHRC human rights obligations all persons to be detained are to be treated with humanity and respect for their inherent dignity (AHRC, 2013, pp. 7). However, in December 2012 UNHCR discovered that the conditions in both Nauru and Manus were overcrowding, harsh and unsatisfactory causing depression and other health issues (AHRC, 2013, pp. 17). Similarly, Burnside (2014) revealed that once refugees landed on Australian grounds, the first thing they were to do was to attend the Immigration department interview disregarding whether they were covered in their own faeces and/or urine. The outcome of treating refugees and asylum seekers in this manner, defies the obligation of being treated humanely as their personal hygiene was completely disregarded causing them to become prone to diseases and illness (AHRC, 2013). Furthermore, in the Burnside (2014) article, a detention centre on Christmas Island neglected its duty to continue supplying essential hygiene necessities such as pads causing one female with a bladder problem to suffer from extreme embarrassment and discomfort. This behaviour rejects the human rights obligation of being entitled to enjoy the highest attainable standard of mental and physical health (AHRC, 2013). The lack of proper medical attention (Burnside, 2014) also plays a part with the high numbers of suicides, self-harming and depression within Australian detentions (AHRC, 2013). Likewise, the Australian Human Rights Commission (2013) stated that the detentions in Australia have a high number of asylum seekers and refugees who are diagnosed with a mental disorder and receive no proper counselling and medical attention. The notion of animals having better rights than the refugees and asylum seekers detained in Australian detentions prove to be true as cases such the Reza Barati are left aside with no legal actions being implemented (Burnside, 2014). Therefore, with these countless records of mistreatment in Australian detentions, it is evident that the treatment towards refugees and asylum seekers detained in Australia rejects those obligations specified by the UNHRC. This reveals that Australian detentions supply nothing but negativity and that it’s “a human right catastrophe with no end in sight” (Burnside, 2014). On the other hand, improvements such as issues concerning health and hygiene are slowly being implemented. In the snapshot report by the AHRC (2013), the Departments have taken steps to improve and strengthen the mental health services across the immigration detention networks. Furthermore, Australia has decided to step towards carrying out a system of community placements on the mainland for asylum seekers and refugees. These include building permanent facilities within Manus Island and Lorengau which are planned to commence to accommodate the tight amount of stable and hygienic detentions (AHRC, 2013). The notion of this has been achieved through the use of bridging visas and building on methods introduced by succeeding Australian Governments (AHRC, 2013). Additionally, Australia has decided to step towards carrying out a system of the constant need for regular immigration monitoring and hence this has notion been heightened within the detentions in Joanna LU 44655185 10/04/15 Nauru and Manus to ensure that the conditions meet UNHRC human rights obligation (AHRC, 2013). The AHRC (2013) also reveals that the necessity of individually assessing detained people taking into consideration their circumstances which include their health and situation. Burnside (2014) suggests that refugees and asylum seekers should be receiving treatment similar to those of animals due to Australian animals having more rights than the refugees and asylum seekers in Australia. These include penalties for not following the UNHRC human rights obligations which include human hygiene and appropriate medical attention. However, due to the subjective nature of the issues regarding to the treatment towards asylum seekers and refugees, implementing these changes may take a sufficient amount of time (AHRC, 2013). All in all, the current treatments of Australian refugees and asylum seekers such as abusing their right to have proper medical attention and the right to have be in an appropriate hygienic environment contradicts those obligations provided by the UNHRC. By doing this, Australia has one of the highest suicide rates as well was the exponential amount of refugees and asylum seekers diagnosed with mental disorders. However, the Australian government has slowly taken steps to make sure that the detained are exposed to proper UNHRC regulations such as constant supplies of necessities and the strengthening of medical centres. Reference List: Australian Human Rights Commission. (2013). ‘Asylum seekers, refugees and human rights’. Retrieved from http://www.humanrights.gov.au, pp.4.20 Burnside, J. (2014). ‘In Australia animals have better rights than asylum seekers.’ Retrieved from http://theconversation.com
A List Of Unusual Argumentative Essay Topics About Asylum-Seekers
Recently strong debates on the major changes in the enforcement of immigration law are raised by intelligentsia communities in many rich countries like Australia and the UK. These advanced countries receive numerous poor immigrant and asylum seekers who reach the shores for shelter, jobs and other purposes for better lifestyles. These asylum seekers have lost the connection with their home countries because of different unavoidable issues. The Australian government is trying to handle these refugees who submit their applications to make overstays in this country for settlement, money earning and standardization of the poor lifestyles. The argumentative essay topics on asylum seekers and new immigration laws are chosen to write the qualitative dissertations.
A List of Controversial Argumentative Topics on Asylum Seekers
- - What do you think about new Australian immigration laws to restrict infiltration and movement of asylum seeker?
- - Analyze the impact of entry of asylum seekers crossing the Australian border.
- - Justify the claims of asylum seekers to have legal permission as refugees
Bring More Innovative Points to Compose Content on Asylum Seekers
Asylum seekers are immigrants who have to leave for other countries for shelter and jobs. These refugees have work permits and visas to get permission to stay in foreign countries. Australian government has to take special initiatives to check the overflow of such unlawful infiltration. When you select the argumentative topic on asylum seekers, you should analyze the situation from different angles. For instance, of late Australian higher authority has brought a new law with intention to make difference between refugees and asylum seekers. An asylum seeker has no visas to cross the borders. His application for declaration of refugees is under process. He is feared because of persecution due to racial profiling and strong class division in his home land. So he needs protection, job security and shelter to overtake such gruesome crisis. This type of unlawful infiltrator is called asylum seeker in Australia.
Highlight Difference between Asylum Seekers and Refugees
On the other hand, a refugee has the legal brand of being refugee with permission to enter into the foreign land as he faces natural calamity at the time of living in his own country. He has no bad history of persecution or hostility. His country welcomes him to start living. However, he is desirous of entering into the foreign country with the hope of getting good jobs to earn money. They are laymen, workers and employees who have no better opportunities to make stays in their countries due to lack of economic resources to upgrade their financial careers. So the hot controversial topics can be formulated highlighting the condition of asylum seekers. Asylum seekers have to struggle and compete to have legal recognition from the government. They are not treated as immigrants, migrants and at least refugees. They are under pressure as their own home countries have venom of vexation and anger to exploit them. They are victims to persecution. Their condition needs to be improved. So your persuasive topics must be powerful to shoot many question tags to ask the readers to seek meaningful answers to end the turmoil of these migrants or asylum seekers.
Many controversial issues regarding rehabilitation of asylum seekers are published online. These topics must be current and useful to writers to do more self-discovery studies to prepare their academic dissertations. These topics get excellent ratings from experts. Your innovative analytical skill must boost up your mind to shortlist some recently published controversial argumentative topics on asylum seekers.